OK, enough pillorying. OP, You're getting roasted for two reasons:
- Your thread title promises certainty but does not deliver
- Scientific method fail. You observe a behavior and propose an explanation - so far, so good. However, you do not account for other possible explanations. Each observation can be explained independently without the collusion hypothesis. You'd need a lot more evidence to convince anyone that collusion is taking place.
Last edited by Martin Alvito; Jan 09, 2010 at 06:55 AM // 06:55..
Reason: redundancy fail. pillorying is by definition public
|